Tuesday, January 28, 2014

We're all Growing: A Positive Spin on Testing

If you are involved in the world of education or not, you have probably heard your fair share of talk about the amount of testing that is done in schools. Particularly in schools deemed "high need" such as the majority of Chicago Public Schools.

Let me begin by saying: absolutely, there is a lot of testing. Too much testing is what many would argue and I would have to agree. Every year I watch my kids go through a battery of tests that are designed to measure student achievement. The ISAT, my least favorite, is given to students each March. The testing period is two weeks long and the pressures that kids and teachers feel are unreal.

I am a special education teacher and I work with a group of wonderful students who have a variety of disabilities which impact their ability to learn. My students, most of whom work at a 2nd or 3rd grade level, are given a test which is written at grade level. In their case, this means the test is written at a 7th or 8th grade level. My students are given extra time and I am allowed to read the directions to them, but after that, they are on their own to "do the best they can." It is heartbreaking. I spend most evenings during ISAT testing drinking wine on my couch, usually in tears. It's awful.

But, because you probably noticed the title of this post as a positive spin on testing, allow me to follow through on my promise and talk about one assessment that does give my students and I something we can grab onto. It is called the NWEA MAP test. If you are a teacher reading this, you probably know exactly what I'm talking about. If you are not, in basic terms, it is a computerized test which asks students questions and then adjusts up and down as the students answer correctly or incorrectly. It is not one size fits all, and for my students, it is encouraging for them to have questions that they are actually able to read.

Now, the thing is, there are big negatives to the MAP test, particularly in how it is administered in many CPS schools. It takes up a lot of time and it definitely takes up valuable computer lab space. I am not discounting any of these points and I think they are very real concerns that I share.

But, in that I promised a positive spin, let me say that the results can be really, really powerful. At my school, we take the test twice a year. Once in the winter as kind of a "practice" round and once in the spring. Results are compared spring to spring and here's the really great thing. We get to talk about student growth.

Yes. Growth. We aren't talking about how far they are away from grade level. We aren't talking about who meets, who exceeds, and in the case of my students, who is in academic warning. Instead, we are talking about how much each individual student grew.

This past week, my students took the MAP test. They take it one by one and while it is a reading test, so I obviously can't read any of it aloud to them, we sit together to ease the nerves. At the end of all the testing, I realized that all of my students had grown from the previous spring. Yes, all of them. Some by very little, some by a lot, but they all moved forward. They all grew.

When I shared this news with all of my bright eyed students, one student's response was my favorite. "Well of course we grew. We work really hard! Can we go to the prize drawer now?"

If that isn't a positive spin on testing, I don't know what is.

Meanwhile on my end, I am growing too...in the pool! At the start of 2014 I decided to start tracking my running, biking, swimming miles. While my running miles weren't much to speak of (goodness, it has been cold), and I have been avoiding the bike (we don't always like each other), I did manage to get in 26,800 yards of swimming during the month of January with my local masters swim team. This is equivalent to 15.2 miles. In the words of my dear students, I think that deserves a trip to the prize drawer!

1 comment:

  1. Sadly, teachers at the school will be judged based on how many students meet or exceed "expected growth" on NWEA from spring to spring. Students with disabilities or who are several years behind their "grade level" or who just have malfunctioning computers will not show expected growth, and this will reflect poorly on the teachers and the schools.... and put ISAT like pressure on everyone to get those growth scores up. I also found when giving the NWEA tests a few years ago to my HS freshmen that the scores were WILDLY unreliable. Students showed 2-3 years of growth between Oct and Jan and then lose that much growth in April... sometimes two students in the same class would have their scores move wildly in opposite directions each time the test was given. Growth is good... but growth on a problematic test that may or not be valid and is clearly unreliable is not worthy of the prize drawer in my opinion. I wish CPS would let you measure growth in your students using assessments that you and your colleagues develop based on your curriculum.

    ReplyDelete